Sunday, May 4, 2014

Two AK Troopers killed in Tanana shooting: Preventable?

VIOLENCE THAT IS PREVENTABLE     Some questions about the Tanana Village incident on May Day 2014.

 https://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/20140501/two-alaska-state-troopers-killed-tanana-shooting

Two Alaska State Troopers killed in Tanana shooting

Alaska Dispatch,Anchorage Daily News
May 1, 2014

While I do not condone the violence that ensued here and my heart goes out to all the victims, including the shooter and the families of those who lost love ones; I think this all could have been avoided with proper training of the Village Public Safety Officers and Alaska State Troopers and a strong State Administration that puts public safety before profits.    

 The biggest question from a public perspective is:

Was the reality TV show "Alaska State Troopers" and the State Government in collusion to put on a "show" in the name of profit over public safety that led to people getting killed?

 So even if the producers or TV stars were not impelled to fly in to Tanana and make a big scene for inciting a "good show", what was the urgency that the Troopers had to make such efforts to go inside a private residence to retrieve someone that may/could have been treated in due process of the Law?
-carl wassilie
  
1)  My first question is what the heck is the State of Alaska doing with the Alaska State Troopers putting them at risk with TV Reality Show that make them "stars". http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/02/us/alaska-state-troopers-killed/

This TV show is an insult to the public and puts the officers involved in the show at psychological and physical risks that are unnecessary, and  should now be heavily investigated if the "show" is leading toward unnecessary risks to the Public and State Troopers.  

The Parnell Administration must be heavily questioned by the public in this questionable action by the "Chief" to allow this to happen in the first place.  If the ties between the reality show and Troopers is influencing decision-making, don't let Parnell get away with this disregard for public safety.

2) Number 2:   What was the VPSO "arresting" the man for in the first place that really needed a "show" by the Alaska State Troopers to enter a private residence without proof of being guilty or without a warrant for arrest???   The Officers may have been following some Superiors officers orders and I think the public should demand answers from the direction of the Superior officers to why the Troopers had to fly into Tanana when there are other process's under the Law that are more effective?  Unnecessary risks, questionably legal?  Were they filming for the show?

3)  The community wasn't at risk until the Troopers arrived to arrest someone based on a report by a VPSO.  Based on some information from public hearings on VPSO's, my guess is  that the VPSO AND troopers may or may not have been properly trained to mitigate violence and reduce risks as such that occurred.   So once again, the Federal Department of Justice and State of Alaska should take the recommendations of the Indian Law and Order Commission Report "Reforming Justice for Alaska Natives"
http://indianlaw.org/content/report-makes-40-recommendations-protect-tribal-communities

4)  Systematic Societal Questions:  Reflect on Policies that shape social deprivation that can lead to violence.  An indigenous perspective on societal and personal violence.

Violence in society generally follows social exclusion of whole peoples, particularly, ethnic policy that deprives people of housing, food, water and culture;  like ANCSA (extinguishing of inherent hunting and fishing rights) .   Alaska's current policy needs to be closely examined in terms of their Laws that leave indigenous peoples into relative deprivation.   Be in awareness of apartheid policies.  In all societies in which certain "classes" of people are put into extreme circumstances, social dissension is prevalent in individuals and society which lead to movements centered on specific "deprivations" from the "affluent" society.

Think about a few social terms that prove my point with SCIENCE when I portray my views on ANCSA as the "extermination act".    I really don't like the victimization excuse of "that's all we (whoever we is) were given".  So I like to describe it scientifically,  which is politically incorrect for every "Alaska Native" institution in existence.

The current western models of 'reducing poverty in rural Alaska and Alaska Native villages' with Community Development Quotas (CDQs) and ANCSA Corporations have not had much of a dent in solving Absolute Poverty, despite having almost a half century of ANCSA and few decades of CDQ's.

Relative Deprivation and Absolute Poverty

Absolute poverty is the level of poverty as defined in terms of the minimal requirements necessary to afford minimal standards of food, clothing, health care and shelter.[10] For the measure to be absolute, the line must be the same in different countries, cultures, and technological levels. Such an absolute measure should look only at the individual's power to consume and it should be independent of any changes in income distribution. The intuition behind an absolute measure is that mere survival takes essentially the same amount of resources across the world and that everybody should be subject to the same standards if meaningful comparisons of policies and progress are to be made. Notice that if everyone's real income in an economy increases, and the income distribution does not change, absolute poverty will decline.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_deprivation
Posted by No comments:

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Ban Toxic Chemical Dispersants: Flawed process to pre-authorize dispersants threatening ALASKA WATERS and Communities

Media Advisory-For Release 13 November-Nov 17th 2013
Alaska Environmental Alliance Condemns Federal Agency Conduct re Chemical Dispersant Pre-Authorization Plans as a Move to Erode the Power of Clean Water Act
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nikos Pastos-Center for Water Advocacy,
AI-TC and Alaska Delegation Spokesperson
nikospastos@hotmail.com

Carl Wassilie-Yup'iaq Biologist

Diane Wagenbrenner
VP Special Project Operations
Lawrence Anthony Earth Organization
COSR Global Alliance Media Relations

See ARRT Website Meeting Schedule/Agendas at:

The Alaska Regional Response Team (ARRT), a federal inter-agency body tasked with formulating response plans to oil and hazardous substance discharges in Alaska, are holding public meetings in five hub Alaskan regions this week to present their revised oil spill response plans. The first meeting, scheduled in King Salmon, Alaska on Wednesday, November 13th will present information on plans that give pre-authorization for the spraying and injection of the same controversial chemical dispersants used on the 1989 Exxon Valdez and 2010 Gulf of Mexico British Petroleum (BP) Oil Spills, to be used in Alaskan waters.

The Alaska Inter-Tribal Council and the Change Oil Spill Response Global Alliance-Alaska Delegation, say Tribal Nations, fisherman and concerned citizens vehemently oppose the plan because it erodes the regulatory power of the Clean Water Act.  In a widely distributed Public Notification to Tribal Governments and Alaskan citizens, they explain that U.S. policies and laws mandating government to government consultation with Tribal Nations on such plans are being undermined and short circuited by the ARRT.

The ARRT’s ‘questionable Tribal Consultation process’, planned to begin on Nov 13th, “is a misuse of public funds to force through approval of the Coast Guard’s dispersant use plans setting a dangerous precedent for inappropriate government to government consultation with Federally Recognized Tribes” said Walter Parker, an Arctic expert with 40 years experience in oil & gas oversight.  “Chemical Dispersant use in oil spill response should be retired globally as obsolete, and is especially inappropriate for Alaska, since they are ineffective in frigid waters” he continued.

The Public Notification educational materials distributed to more than 250 potentially impacted Tribal and Fishing communities illustrate that human rights violations are taking place through the ARRT’s inept Tribal engagement processes.  According to the documents, the pre authorization plans would allow for the use of chemical dispersants over the objections of Tribal authorities and environmental groups in the event of an oil spill. 

I.  See attached documents for details.
II. See ARRT website for meeting information at: http://alaskarrt.org/Documents.aspx?f=12371

PLEASE CALL IN TO OR ATTEND THESE GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED MEETINGS AND HELP TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS AND THE PUBLIC GET ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

Any proposal for the use of chemical dispersants requires that the following questions be addressed by the inter-agency ARRT presenting their dispersant plans for discussion:

a.      Of greatest importance in oil spill response is rapid reduction of oil toxicity and its impact on ecosystems and threat to human health. Dispersants do not remove oil or reduce toxicity of the oil but increase it, how does the revised plan address this?

b.      Based on 2012 DOI testing and other science we have reviewed, dispersants are not effective in frigid waters below a certain temperature.  How does your plan overcome that?

c.       How will dispersants applied by aerial and/or other application methods not impact marine life, coastal and up-river communities?

d.      Since dispersants do not remove oil and its most toxic compounds but instead sink and disperse them into the water column increasing absorption capacity and ingestion by marine life, how is this addressed in the plan?

e.      How will chemical dispersants not impact Customary and Traditional and Modern Life-ways of hunting, fishing, gathering ability to navigate and access clean water?

f.        What non-toxic alternatives can be used to replace chemical dispersants invented by and/or owned by the major oil companies? (LAEO’s research has found technology that does indeed exist to truly detoxify and swiftly clean up an oil spill, and that technology is being successfully used in many parts of the world today.)

g.      How does the use of chemical dispersants comply with the Clean Water Act?  (see: http://protectmarinelifenow.org/revitalization )

(Note: See also study/position paper at: www.protectmarinelifenow.org which is based on multiple scientific studies cited indicating unquestionable food chain, ecosystem and human health impacts of dispersants.)      If any proposed chemical dispersant guidelines do not meet the criteria at: http://protectmarinelifenow.org/identification for selecting products for oil spill cleanup, they should not be approved.  

See Attached Materials for more details:

1.       Briefing to Tribes-Urgent Action Required, Fed Agency Undermine of Tribal Government Authority

2.      Tribal Exclusion Fact Sheet

3.      An Open Letter to Oil Spill Response Professionals

4.      Sample Tribal Resolution to Ban Chemical Dispersants (11 Resolutions passed and enacted thus far)

5.      A Case Against Chemical Dispersants

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nikos Pastos-Center for Water Advocacy,
AI-TC and Alaska Delegation Spokesperson
nikospastos@hotmail.com

Carl Wassilie-Yup'iaq Biologist

Diane Wagenbrenner
VP Special Project Operations
Lawrence Anthony Earth Organization
COSR Global Alliance Media Relations

See ARRT Website Meeting Schedule/Agendas at:
Posted by No comments:

Friday, July 5, 2013

Outdated science and bureaucracy is standing in the way of a clean Gulf of Mexico, Alaska and thousands of other toxic spill sites throughout Earth’s lands and waters.

 ALASKA'S  BIG VILLAGE NETWORK is a proud member of
Change Oil Spill Response Global Alliance
 http://protectmarinelifenow.org/alaska-alliance
You are here: Home > Alaska Alliance
http://protectmarinelifenow.org/alaska-alliance

The Alaska Regional Response Team (ARRT), consisting of federal and state agency officials responsible for protecting and safeguarding Alaskan lands and waters, is ready to give the green light to chemical dispersant preauthorization plans that were  presented at their May 22 meeting in Valdez, Alaska.
Fearing the ARRT’s dispersant plan approval, Alaskan groups and tribes led by the Alaska Inter-Tribal Council (AITC) have begun enacting statewide, legally binding tribal resolutions opposing the use of chemical dispersant substances in oil spill contingency planning throughout Alaska. With more than 200 indigenous tribes living in remote wilderness, many without grocery stores, and, who have no direct representation at the ARRT table, a decision to apply chemical dispersants to mitigate oil spills has untenable trade-offs impacting their fisheries and polluting their food and water sources.
While this tribal feud with federal agencies has been going on for years, the AITC  has joined forces with the Lawrence Anthony Earth Organization. This coalition is a newly-formed regional partnership for Alaska and part of LAEO’s Change Oil Spill Response (COSR) Global Alliance initiative.
The AITC coalition of Alaskan tribal representatives and groups now formed as the Change Oil Spill Response Global Alliance Delegation prepared documentation and scientific studies supporting the complete elimination of chemical dispersants in Alaskan spill response. They have delivered  18 Tribal Council resolutions currently in hand to the committee co-chairs: Mr. Mark Everett, U.S. Coast Guard, and Chris Field, EPA Coordinator. 
Chief Michael Stickman of Nulato, International Chair of the Arctic Athabascan Council and a leading member of a newly established Arctic Council Task Force working to substantially improve procedures for combating oil spills in the Arctic, endorsed the Alliance formation stating: “Committing to clean up oil spills after they happen is insufficient. Precaution and nation-to-nation Tribal Government Consultation and free, prior, informed consent must be enacted before hasty implementation of a policy of pre-authorizing toxic chemical dispersants substances in oil spill contingency planning. Why have less toxic bioremediation methods with a 20-year track record of effectiveness been ignored by the Alaska inter-agency Regional Response Team?”
Consolidated Alaskan Tribes have a straightforward demand — they require clean water and healthy fisheries, which are critical to their survival as people living in an arctic environment. Tribes have treaty rights as sovereign nations and have considerable authority over what affects their ability to hunt, fish and sustain their lifestyles as Native Americans.
LAEO’s Science and Technology Advisory Board released a 44-page position paper last month outlining an entirely new approach to oil spill problems associated with drilling, transport, pipelines, and storage mishaps, entitled  A Call for a Twenty-First-Century SOLUTION in Oil Spill Response. 
The Alaska Inter-Tribal Council requested LAEO’s assistance and are now using their materials to educate tribal governments and communities on the chemical dispersant issue throughout Alaska. Many tribes are in remote locations, not connected to broadband and have little to no representation for protecting fishing, hunting, gathering and bartering interests. Tribes and Coastal communities are disproportionately impacted by federal, and state decision makers who gift to outside multi-national corporations large entitlements and easy access to Alaska’s waters, land, air and salmon streams often ignoring pre-existing rights of indigenous Alaskans and other citizens.

Read and Download Documentation from the Alaska Alliance.



 http://protectmarinelifenow.org/alaska-alliance

 http://protectmarinelifenow.org/

 

Please send this communication to anyone you know who is able to reach Oil & Gas Industry Leaders, EPA and other agency officials at Fed, State levels responsible for Environmental Health, Quality and Protection. 


Outdated science and bureaucracy is standing in the way of a clean Gulf of Mexico, Alaska and thousands of other toxic spill sites throughout Earth’s lands and waters.  Many members of the US EPA, interagency response community and industry professionals do care and are looking for a better way forward, we want to help. 

The Science & Technology Advisory Board of the Lawrence Anthony Earth Organization (LAEO) has just published a significant position paper entitled A Call for a Twenty-First-Century Solution in Oil Spill Response.   The goal of this effort is to get safe, non-toxic, cost-effective, oil-spill response plans adopted for all future incidents in U.S. navigable waters and around the world. 

The material contained in this analysis and guide is a constructive offering for oil and energy industry professionals and every oil-producing nation in the world to better manage potentially contaminated ecosystems. The work brings a new analysis and assessment of oil-spill response and offers effective alternative technologies for replacing dispersant chemical application in an oil spill or deep-water drilling crisis like the 2010 BP blowout and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. It contains guidelines for the selection process for cleanup agents, along with an evaluation process (evaluating toxicity, effectiveness, speed, and cost) that can be used to grade potential effectiveness of cleanup agents being considered for removing spilled oil from the environment.

Alongside publishing this paper, LAEO has launched a government and public education awareness campaign. The campaign, headquartered at www.protectmarinelifenow.org seeks to bring critically important reforms to oil spill cleanup guidelines to improve response methodology for protecting marine and wildlife, sensitive habitats and human health.

Tax payers, oil companies and their shareholders and many other stakeholders stand to save billions of dollars in cleanup costs as well as irreparable damages of natural resources, secondary remediation and litigation costs.  

We recommend that your first step in the education process would be for you to read the Overview.
If you agree with the position we lay out in these documents please contact me to join the Change Oil Spill Response Global Alliance to help in this effort to open the worldwide industry discussion and build a consensus for safe, non-toxic, efficient, lower-cost, oil-spill response methods. 
----
·         Read: LAEO Position Paper Overview: http://protectmarinelifenow.org/preamble-summary

·         Study: Revised Fact Sheet: BIOREMEDIATION TECHNIQUES, CATEGORY DEFINITIONS, AND MODES OF ACTION IN MARINE AND FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENTS at http://protectmarinelifenow.org/295-2

·         Forward the position paper to others: Link to the Complete 44-page Position Paper: A Call for a Twenty-First-Century Solution in Oil Spill Response.

·         What can you do?  Help educate others, forward these links.


Thank you! 

http://protectmarinelifenow.org/alaska-alliance


Posted by No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)